Merging Variants

Considering that there are multiple variants of Beanbons, would it make sense to merge them all into the regular Beanbon's page, or at least give each variant a section on Beanbon's page and link to the main article?  The Waddle Dee article uses the latter method, and although Waddle Dees have many more variants than Beanbons do, it seems that (partial) merging would be efficient in this case also.  Would a merge or partial merge like this be a good idea?  I apologize that I don't know the standard practice for this. Anonymous Waddle Dee Stop Waddle Dee massacres.png There goes the 9,948,762nd one. 18:58, March 10, 2018 (UTC)

I'd say of the two ideas, the second one is more ideal. Alternatively, we could simply add a "Related Enemies" section like we did on Cotta. Waddle Dee's "Variants" section is a bit of a special case since Waddle Dee has dozens and dozens of slightly different variations, many of which are unnamed. With smaller families like Beanbon and Cotta, separating each into different articles works well enough--the same can't be said for 30+ Waddle Dee pages. NerdyBoutKirby Talk about a rosebleed! Noooooo! 02:37, March 11, 2018 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.