User talk:Kirby128

Hi there! First off, welcome to Kirby Wiki and thank you for making several edits. While several of the edits do indeed improve the article, I think there are several things which should be clarified, as some of the content that you've added does not conform to the style of writing of Wikis as well as the criteria for inclusion as content.

Nouns, when used, refer to the official terminology whenever possible and not to personal preference. The good ending in K64 is widely-considered to be the canonical ending, and with good reason, but no source ever said that it is the True Ending, and it should not be referred to as such.

Commentaries should be left out completely, as they are personal opinions, and not facts. Theories should be avoided whenever possible, and if ever used, it should be for very good reason e.g. to explain something significant in the plot which is otherwise not explained, and it should be presented very deliberately and carefully and supported with solid facts i.e. official information, which are best referenced or alternatively posted on the talk page.

Lastly, styling not conforming to Manual of Style should be avoided, i.e. underlining the title of Kirby 64, as this results in loss of standardization.

Cheers,  Changtau2005  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~  Ribbon agrees!  20:42, June 5, 2011 (UTC)